When a lawyer goes from the role of an attorney to a judge, one is to expect that he or she is to seek to uphold the law of the United States of America and seeking findings that are fair and just for the citizens.
Juan Merchan has been a part of the Biden Adminstration’s law-fare. A relatively unknown lawyer to date, Juan came to line when his kangeroo court activies came to light as he sought to take President Trump out of running for re-election of the United States executive branch, bankrupt the president, and imprison him.
One news source says-
“The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that a former president has substantial immunity for official acts committed while in office.
In the formal motion in July, Trump attorney Todd Blanche pointed to the Supreme Court’s immunity decision, and argued that certain evidence of “official acts” should not have been admitted during the trial.
Specifically, Blanche argued that testimony from former White House Communications Director Hope Hicks; former Special Assistant to the President Madeleine Westerhout; testimony regarding The Special Counsel’s Office and Congressional Investigations and the pardon power; testimony regarding President Trump’s response to FEC Inquiries; his presidential Twitter posts and other related testimony was impermissably admitted during trial. “
Did Juan not get the memo? The citizen’s of the US did not buy his attempts to discredit the former and incoming president. Is it time for the Justice Department to investigate the ethics of Juan’s court?
Investigate every single civil rights complaint these judges and prosecutors have received. I’m sure they will find a pattern of practice and then they can be charged federal for civil rights violations.
Judge Merchan must recuse himself, and the case should be dismissed. His daughter’s ties to a Democratic consulting firm and his own political donations to the democrat party create a clear appearance of bias, violating 28 U.S.C. § 455 and the principles upheld in Nixon v. Fitzgerald. The public trust in a fair trial is compromised when impartiality is in question. To preserve justice, Merchan must step down, and this case should be thrown out and dismissed to preserve the integrity of the U.S. judicial system. The constitutional principles of due process and impartial justice back the call for recusal and dismissal. The appearance of bias is not just a procedural issue; it’s a matter of constitutional rights being compromised.
Throughout history, weaponized legal systems have toppled democracies by undermining public trust. From ancient Rome’s politically charged trials to modern America’s legal battles against Trump, the tactic is the same: silence opposition, not through debate, but through prosecution. True democracy thrives when justice is impartial, and public servants are held to the same standards, regardless of ideology. When will we learn that every misuse of justice leaves the nation weaker?
This judge let a misdemeanor charge that the statute of limitations had expired on and turned it into 34 felony counts….If this makes it to the Supreme Court it will explode, and Merchant and Bragg may be disbarred and charged with abuse of power, wrongful conviction and violation of Trumps civil rights.